jeudi 13 mars 2008

Human Rights Council 7th Session, March 10th 2008, Morning

This morning’s meeting was opened by the statement of Ms. Lucia Maria Brandão F. Lobato, minister of Justice of Timor-Leste, which was followed by the conclusion of the Interactive Discussion with the Special Rapporteur on Human Rights of Migrants.Then, the Council began interactive discussions with the Special Rapporteur on the adverse effects of the illicit movement and dumping of toxic and dangerous wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, the Chairperson of the Working Group on arbitrary detention and with the Chairperson of the Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination.

Minister of Justice of Timor-Leste, Ms. Lucia Lobato, began her speech by conveying the message of President Jose-Ramos Horta whose health was improving every day. As he came out of his coma his words were of peace and a call for no revenge. Timor-Leste was extremely challenged with its capacity building, which required the stimulation of the economy and the strengthening of the Government. Thus measures to combat poverty had to enhance education, social development and strengthen law, and democracy. Among its successes was the establishment of the National Human Rights Action Plan of Timor-Leste, which involved widespread public engagement and identified six priority areas, the Minister said. Those areas were: education, health, justice, security, agriculture and infrastructure. The Minister concluded her speech by stressing that despite recent setbacks in the process of State-building, the leadership and people of Timor-Leste were even more committed to democracy and human rights, as they remained a vibrant and free society.

Continuation of Item 3: Interactive dialogue with Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, Mr. Jorge Bustamante

During the interactive dialogue, Sri Lanka, Ecuador, The Russian Federation, Pakistan, Philippines, Algeria, Bangladesh, Turkey, Nigeria, Slovenia, Brazil, Indonesia, Senegal, Mauritania, Morocco and several NGOs took the floor.

All the countries which took the floor, expressed their gratitude to Mr. Bustamante’s work as Special Rapporteur on the human rights of Migrants. Most of the speakers conveyed their concerns regarding the thorny situation of migrants around the world. Every State, either country of origin, transit and destination, should make efforts to prevent the spreading phenomenon of xenophobia against migrants. Cooperation and participation of the civil society in this regard was urged this morning.

The representative of Sri Lanka stressed the importance of the ratification of the Convention on Migration, pointing out that many of the Western States have not done so.

The representative of Pakistan stated that the integration of migrants is important to ensure an impartial treatment in the respect of human rights. He also added that it was the sovereign right of States to evaluate border controls and their migration policy.

The representative of the Philippines, said that migrants are vulnerable to trafficking and abuses, and stressed the universality of human rights which, must be valid for migrants as well. The Philippines, underlining their commitment in this regard, will host in October 2008 the Second Global Forum on Migration and Development. In January 2008, the Philippines also participated to the meetings of the Colombo Process in Abu Dhabi for the protection of migrants’ human rights.

The representative of Bangladesh accused Western countries to have unconsciously encouraged xenophobia against migrants among their citizens.

The representative of Slovenia, on behalf of the European Union, expressed his country’s equal concerns with the risks faced by migrants who are looking for a better life, and in particular the need to protect them. A major dialogue is needed, and the contribution of other UN bodies, such as the IOM, is vital to these endeavours.

The representative of Indonesia stressed the importance of the dialogue between the country of origin and the country of destination. Multilateral and bilateral cooperation is therefore important to establish a regulation to prevent irregular migrations.

A series of NGOs then took the floor.

Reports on Toxic and Dangerous Wastes, Arbitrary Detention and Mercenaries

The Special Rapporteur on toxic and dangerous products and wastes on the enjoyment of human rights, Mr. Ibeanu affirmed that the movement of hazardous wastes and products across the globe, and particularly from developed to developing countries continued to flourish. Mr. Ibeanu also noted that he continued to receive information on alleged violations to the right to information regarding environmental matters and the impact on affected populations. He stressed that providing public access to information when requested was imperative for the prevention of human rights violations and the protection of the environment.

The chairperson-Rapporteur of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Ms. Zerrougui stated that during 2007, the Working Group had held three annual sessions, answered to 169 urgent calls and adopted 40 opinions concerning 146 people. In 24 of the 40 cases, the Working Group had estimated that the deprivation of liberty was of arbitrary nature. In the majority of cases, concerned governments had provided the Group with all required information. Other examined situations included secret detentions, illegal transfers and the judgment of civilians by military courts.

In presenting his report, Mr. Gómez del Prado, the chairman of the Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries as a Means of Impeding the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination, said that there was an emergence of a flourishing private military and security industry, and that all geopolitical regions of the world were concerned by this phenomenon. He called on all governments to regulate private military companies and to bring Human Rights violators to justice.

As concerned countries, Ukraine, Tanzania, Norway, Equatorial Guinea, Angola, Peru, Fiji and Chile took the floor.


Ruxandra Mathia & Marco Minocri

Speach of the minister of justice:

REPÚBLICA DEMOCRÁTICA DE TIMOR-LESTE

7th SESSION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL

GENEVA - SWITZERLAND
MARCH 2008

Address by

H. E. Ms. Lucia Maria Brandao F. Lobato
Minister of Justice


Mr. President,Excellencies,



Firstly, I wish to join my colleagues who spoke before me in extending
my warm congratulations to you, Mr. President on your leadership, over
this august body for the past nine months, which, not only had to deal
with the intensive work of institution building of this Council but
also is confronted with serious and complex challenges such as the
Palestine-Israel situation, Darfur, Sudan to mention a few.

Allow me to also extend my congratulations to the High Commissioner
for Human Rights, Justice Louise Arbor, who, with her team has
indefectibly supported and assist us in our quest for Human Rights
Justice.

I would like to convey to you the message of our President Jose Ramos
Horta whose health is improving every day. He asked me to thank you
heart fully for all the messages of concern and sympathy. Also our
recognition to the peace keeping forces who have assisted us in
providing security to our Timorese people in the most recent event. As
soon as he came out of his induced coma, his words were for a message
of Peace and a call for no revenge. Today, we should look toward the
future and to a government of National Unity where everyone has his
rights and place for his convictions. President Jose Ramos Horta
commitment and determination to the cause of Timorese is even stronger
today. Together, with the Prime Minister, the goal is to pull all energies
in the rebuilding of the country.


I cannot address this august body today without paying tribute to our
previous Secretary General of the United Nations, Mr. Kofi Annan for
his tireless efforts for the search for Peaceful settlement as witness
by his achievement in resolving the crises in Kenya.

Our fight for independence has passed through this august body. The
support of the Human Rights Commission who preceded this Council has
been determinant in the establishment of our State. I would also like
to recognize the invaluable contribution by the special reporters
, which contributed to the recognition of our cause.

We in Timor-Leste, we are proud to say today that we have ratified all Human Rights conventions. Furthermore, in order to ensure that it is
effectively implemented, I, as Minister of Justice, can confirm to you
that all, I repeat all our International commitments, once ratified by
our National parliament become part of our National Law.
I acknowledged that the test for our country will be the
implementation of those treaties to which we have become a party and
to ensure that every citizen has the opportunity to reach his or her
potential. Timor-Leste was one of the first signatory of the Geneva Declaration on armed violenceand Development which aims to develop measures to enhance securityfor all and thus, laying the ground for Development.

Our today priorities are multiple, but the number one priority is with
no contest our battle against poverty, illiteracy and exclusion.

My country is extremely challenged with the capacity building required
to stimulate the economy and to strengthen Government. These needs of
our people are pressing and immediate to ensure the long-term
prosperity of our country. Clean water, security, is one of the
fundamental rights as well as the expectation of our new generation
for a better future with prospect of jobs for everyone. To this, we
have to monopolize all our energies. The measures to combat poverty need to enhance education, enhance social development; strengthen law, order, and democracy; This represent the essential foundations upon which fundamental human rights and the inherent dignity of the individual can be built.
Our duty is to ensure a future for our new generation. We are
accountable toward these coming generations.

Many challenges lay ahead of us, many situation need to be addressed,
Violence is not the way to achieve it, it only represent an attempt to
undermine our collective right to freedom and democracy; an attempt to
reverse the democratic transformations taking place in our country. We
are committed to hold accountable the perpetrators and to bring them to
Justice. For a recent nation such as ours, governance is new, and the
challenge to build a new nation from the ashes of that which was razed
to the ground remains a daunting and difficult task.

We are developing diverse programme or activities to encourage further
growth on the building and strengthening national institutions to
promote and protect human rights and democracy under the rule of law; on the formulation of a national action plan for the promotion and
protection of human rights; on human rights education and training;
and on promoting a human rights culture.

To those ends, our successes include: the establishment of the Office
of the Provedor for Justice and Human Rights; the establishment of a National Commission for the Right of the Child to become effective mid 2008, My ministry is intensely involved in establishing a comprehensive and consistent legal framework to ensure the promotion and protection of the right of the Child. The National Human Rights Action Plan, which
involves widespread public engagement, identifies six priorities
areas: EDUCATION, HEALTH, JUSTICE, SECURITY, AGRICULTURE AND
INFRASTRUCTURE (such as clean drinking water, roads, electricity). On
January 17 of this year, I presented Timor-Leste’s initial report and Common Core Document to the Committee of the Convention here in Geneva and my Government will soon send the initial report of CEDAW. However, In the face of adversity, there are still many obstacles and
much to do.

Indicators for Timor-Leste show that the country continues to be
confronted with significant challenges in health, education,
infrastructure, with high levels of poverty, significant mortality
rates, malnourishment in infants and young children and poor rates of
literacy.
To give you some examples, 41% of Timor Leste's population remains
under the internationally recognized poverty line, with the incidence
particularly high in rural areas. Unemployment is high. It is also
estimated that 45% of children in Timor-Leste are underweight and
approximately 25% of primary education aged children are not enrolled
in school .

Psychological and physical violence against women and girls remains a
serious and deeply ingrained social problem in Timor-Leste that
requires immediate and coordinated attention. Combating domestic
violence and working to address entrenched discrimination against
women, particularly in respect of access to services, is and must
remain a priority for the Government.

Significant challenges to the institutions of law and order also
remain. We are working hard to guarantee the democratic rule of law in
a fair and effective manner that respects human rights, that serves
people, is incorrupt and provides security for Timorese and foreigners
alike.

We are working closely with the UN and international assistance in an
effort to establish a credible and impartial police service and
independent judiciary with capacity and understanding to uphold the
law and to promote the rule of law in a manner that is consistent with
international human rights standards.

In terms of the judiciary, serious limitations in recruiting and
training of qualified judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneys
coupled with a lack of effective and efficient case management within
the judicial system has resulted in delays in bringing matters to
trial. Overall then, the process of establishing an effective and
accountable system of justice has been slow despite the ongoing
commitment of the Government to strengthening the judiciary.

Excellencies

Facing the overwhelming challenge, our commitment to the cause of
Human Rights, deeply embedded in our spirit and our constitution, is
stronger than ever.

· As one of the world’s newest nations, independence marked the watershed of our future. A large part of Timor-Leste’s struggle was fought on the humanitarian front and Timor-Leste had been actively engaged in the human rights processes, especially vis a vis the Geneva based human rights mechanisms. It now falls upon us to reverberate our hard won freedom through respect for human dignity in all of our practices. As a new nation, we have integrated the promotion and protection of human rights into all areas of life and such belief is enshrined in our Constitution.

· The Human Rights Council is of particular interest to us due to our difficult history, struggle for self-determination and international solidarity that Timor-Leste has benefited from.

· Despite of the recent set back in the process of state building, the leadership and the people are even more commited to democracy and human rights. Timor-Leste remains a vibrant and free society.

· Timor-Leste believes it has gained sufficient experience and benefits to share with the International Community. The “success” of TL is consequent of good international partnership and cooperation;

For all these reasons and as many of you know, our intention is to present ourselves to the
Council of Human Rights and we appreciate all expression of your support.

Excellencies

Addressing the challenges facing our World, let me express some of our concern.

My government has established diplomatic relations with Palestine and
accorded the Palestinian envoy all the privileges and immunities
provided for in the Vienna Convention. The same, my government
established full diplomatic relations with the State of Israel.

My government regrets the loss of so many innocent lives, Israelis and
Palestinians in this seemingly endless spiral of violence,
retaliation, revenge, and hatred. We condemn the indiscriminate
killing of innocent civilians whether by Palestinian or by Israeli.

There are many on each side of the border striving for peace and
mutual respect, for the peaceful co-existence of the two states.
Israeli and Palestinian moderates deserve our admiration and support
as they face dangers and pressures from many quarters and yet they are
the only hope for durable peace.

Israel has the right to undertake measures to protect its citizens
against extremist elements; however, escalation has to stop. Violence
is not the road to Peace.

We regret that the so-called Road Map agreed to by all sides is not
being implemented.

The never-ending tragedy in Darfur is challenging our credibility as
promoters of Human rights. We have a collective duty to counter the
gross and systematic abuses of Human rights, war crimes and crime
against humanity.

Excellencies,


Let me again thank the very valuable support we have received from
member States and the ongoing technical assistance and support from
the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.



Thank you

(Dorothee)

lundi 10 mars 2008

HLS, 7th March

7th Session of the Human Rights Council
Geneva, 7th March 2008


HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL DISCUSSES ANNUAL REPORT OF HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

Morning

This morning United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, presented her annual report to the HRC. Then an interactive dialogue was followed about this document. Ms. Arbour announced that she will not seek a second term in the Office as she had informed the Secretary-General.

Louise Arbour, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
Ms. Arbour began her statement by expressing deep sadness at the killings yesterday in Israel and Iraq. With regard to the Universal Periodic Review process, Ms. Arbour said the Council must support the participation of least developed countries to the review. However she noticed that it is involved financial commitments. In this regard, she urged donor countries to give special attention to the two Universal Periodic Review trust funds mandated by the General Assembly.
She stated that poverty and global inequalities remain fundamental issues for the OHCHR. She reaffirmed OHCHR’s efforts to place women’s rights at the core of the work of the Office. Ms. Arbour welcomed the renewal of agreements for OHCHR offices in Nepal, Colombia and Mexico. She also thanked the Government of Senegal with which OHCHR reached an agreement in November 2007, for the establishment of a Regional Office for West Africa. The High Commissioner expressed her concerns regarding the situation in West Darfur where violence has recently increased. The OHCHR praised Kofi Annan’s commitment to the Kenyan crisis and encouraged the parties to reach an agreement to determinedly pursue peace. She also said that she had been concerned by acts of violence recently committed in Sri Lanka.
Ms. Arbour said that is unacceptable that some member states accused the integrity of her Office, blaming it for hypocrisy, insubordination and dereliction of duties.

Statements by concerned countries
Speaking as concerned countries were Mexico, Sudan, Georgia, Colombia, Senegal, Sri Lanka and Kenya. All of them thanked the High Commissioner for her work and efforts and also expressed regrets that she would not seek a second mandate. They also made some remarks about the relationship between the OHCHR and the Council. Some countries insisted on the fact that the High Commissioner has to have financial independence and autonomy of action to be really effective. Others said that there was a lack of coordination with States and budget planning.

Interactive Debate in the Report of the High Commissioner
Speaking in the interactive dialogue with the High Commissioner were Pakistan on behalf of the Organization of the Islamic Conference, Indonesia, Cuba, India, Israel, China, Egypt on behalf of the African Group, Slovenia on behalf of the European Union, Sweden, Brazil, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, Spain, the Netherlands, Canada, Algeria, France, Germany, Australia and United Kingdom.

Havio Abbas, Indonesia
Mr. Abbas, on behalf of his government, praised Ms. Arbour’s work carried on during her mandate. Indonesia expressed its appreciation to the successful commitment of the Council, as major tool for the protection of Human Right. Considering the UPR one of the most innovative mechanisms, Mr. Abbas declared his country’s commitment to be evaluated.

Juan Antonio Fernandez Palacios, Cuba
The representative of Cuba regretted the decision of the High Commissioner not to seek a second term. He greeted her for her great work.

Swashpawan Singh, India
After praising Ms. Arbour’s tireless efforts to ensure the functioning of the Council, Mr. Singh underlined the importance of the geographical balance in the Council. With regard to the conflict of relations between the HRC and the OHCHR, India urged that this issue requires more discussions. The two bodies should work in tandem in order to achieve their common goals.

Wang Qun, China
China, expressing its deep impression following Ms. Arbour decision not to seek a second mandate, hopes that she will continue her commitment for the protection of Human Rights. Representative of China remarked that the action plan for 2008-2009 made much reference to countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Consequently he stated that it was hoped that the Council would also take into account other regions. Remarks about the geographic imbalance inside the staff of OHCHR and the question of transparency in budgetary matters were mentioned. The importance of the Durban Conference was underlined as a major tool to fight racism.

Eva Tomic, Slovenia on behalf of the European Union
The European Union is really sorry that Ms. Arbour will not seek a second mandate. The UPR would be essential for the credibility of the Council and provided the international community a transparent, candid, meaningfully constructive review process. The EU appreciated the update of the High Commissioner concerning the strategic thematic areas such as impunity, poverty, discrimination, armed conflict and violence, among others.

Erlinda F. Basilio, Philippines
The Philippines praised Ms. Arbour’s hard work devoted during these past four years for the promotion of human rights. The Philippines attached great importance to the UPR, as one of the most effective tool to improve the international mechanism for the promotion and protection of human rights.

Hoonnin Lim, Republic of Korea
Representative of the Republic of Korea thanked the High Commissioner for her outstanding work. Mr. Hoonnin Lim welcomed the plan to open some new regional offices. He remarked also that consultations should take place between the OHCHR and the Council in order to improve its relationship. However, he reaffirmed that the independence of the Office, as part of the United Nations Secretary, had to be respected.

Caroline Millar, Australia
The representative of Australia thanked the high Commissioner for the leadership, integration and innovation that she had accomplished into the OHCHR. Ms. Millar thanked also Ms. Arbour for her remarks concerning the apology of Australia to its indigenous people.

Explanations of Vote after Vote on Resolution on Palestine
Speaking in explanations of the vote after the vote on the resolution on the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, which was adopted the 6th March 2008, were Brazil, Japan and Uruguay.

Marco and Meriam

jeudi 6 mars 2008

A/HRC/7/L.1 : Item 7 Draft Resolution Adoption

United Nations A
__________________________________________________
General Assembly Distr. LIMITED
__________________________________________________
A/HRC/7/L.1
5 March 2008 Original ENGLISH

HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
Seventh Session
Agenda Item 7

HUMAN RIGHTS SITUATIONS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES

Pakistan (on behalf of the Organisation of the Islamic Conference), Palestine* (on behalf of the League of Arab States): draft resolution

7/... Human rights violations emanation from Israeli military attacks and incursions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly the recent ones in the occupied Gaza Strip

* Non-state member of the Human Rights Council

The Human Rights Council,

Guided by the principles and objectives of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Right and the International Covenants on Human Rights,

Guided also by the right of all peoples to [self defence and] self-determination and the inadmissibility of the acquisition of land by the use of force, as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations,

Affirming the applicability of the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,

Affirming also the applicability of the international human rights laq to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem,

Recognizing that the Israeli military attacks and incursion in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly the recent ones in the occupied Gaza Strip, constitute [grave] violations of international humanitarian law and of the human rights of the Palestinian people therein and undermine international efforts, including the Annapolis Conference and the Paris International Donor’s Conference for the Palestinian State, aimed at invigorating the peace process and establishing a viable, contiguous, sovereign and independent Palestinian State by the end of 2008,

Recognizing also that the recent Israeli attacks and incursions in the occupied Gaza Strip have led to a considerable loss of life and injuries among Palestinian civilians, including women, children and infants,
  1. Condemns the persistent Israeli military attacks and incursions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly the recent ones in the Gaza Strip which resulted in the loss of more than 125 lives and hundreds of injuries among Palestinian civilians, including women, childre, and infants;

  2. Expresses its shock at the Israeli bombardment of Palestinian homes and the killing of civilians therein and at the Israeli policy of inflicting collective punishment against the civilian population, [which constitutes a war crime] which is contrary to International Humanitarian Law, and calls for bringing toe perpetrators to justice;

  3. Calls for the immediate cessation of all Israeli military attacks throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory and the firing of crude rockets, [by Palestinian combatants,] which resulted in the loss of two civilians and some injuries in southern Israel;

  4. Also calls for urgent international action to put an immediate end to the grave violations commited by the occupying Power, Israel, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including the series of incessant and repeated Israeli military attacks and incursions therein and the siege of the occupied Gaza Strip,

  5. Reiterates it s call for immediate protection of the Palestinian people in the Occupied Palestinian Territory in compliance with international human rights law and international humanitarian law;

  6. Urges all parties concerned to respect the rules of international human rights law and international humanitarian law and to refrain from violence against civilian populations;

  7. Request the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to report to the Council, at it s next session, on the progress made in the implementation of the present resolution.
-----

Pakistan (OIC) explains the resolution and changes (In blue, [...] means deleted).
Jordan:
Yesterday we said that credibility is at stake.
We cannot accept the death of these people.
Occupation, but also the origin of violence and resistance to occupation.
-> In other ways, we will loose credibility.
Conclusion:
Pursue a constructive dialogue.

Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay:
Spirit of consensus need
It was our wish that the HRC would see this need under a broader perspective
-> Significant change on the ground is important.
Finally, HRC should be concerned with Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT)

Statement Israel

Statement Palestine

------

MEMBERS: Explain vote

Slovenia (on behalf of EU):
Explanation:
We have a clear EU Position. -> Forge consensus
We agree with some elements, but not the text as a whole, particularly OP 3.
We will abstain.

Switzerland:
We will vote „yes“ for this resolution.
„Yes“, but it needs an interpretation:
It’s a signal because of the grave situation.
We’d like to recognize the efforts of the initial text.
We would have wished to go further...
It was not possible
Since it is a delicate subject, it is important for us to speak in one voice.
We want to note to the protocol that this text is not responding to our expectations. We wanted: „military operations“ and we also wanted to see in the text the condemnation of the firing crude rockets.
Any violation of International Humanitarian Law must be condemned.

Canada:
HRC has to check the situation
We are concerned by this situation
HAMAS: appeared violent
Must stop immediately
Israel has a legitimate right for self-defence.
Through dialogue
Annapolis
We promised 3 millions to the Palestinian people in Paris Donor conference,
Abbas: Peace talks
Canada will vote against this resolution.

Netherlands (EU):
Spreads terror: Palestinians need to get back to the peace process
Israel: restraint (but we accept self-defence)
We regret the Palestinians injured
-> The resolution does not speak about civilians
-> Resume the peace talks
We have to work to peace
For a two states solution
In our opinion: all elements are not correctly reflected
Under this circumstances we will abstain.

------

Voting

Japan: yes
Jordan: yes
Madagascar: yes
Malaysia: yes
Mali: yes
Mexico: yes
NL: abstain
Nicaragua: abstain
Nigeria: yes
Pakistan: yes
Peru: yes
Philippines: yes
Qatar: yes
Republic of Korea: abstain
Rumania: abstain
Russia: yes
Saudi Arabia: yes
Senegal: yes
Slovenia: abstain
South Africa: yes
Sri Lanka: yes
Switzerland: yes
Ukraine: abstain
Uruguay: yes
Zambia: yes
Angola: yes
Azerbaijan: yes
Bangladesh: yes
Bolivia: yes
Bosnia and Herzegovina: abstain
Brazil: yes
Cameroon: abstain
Canada: no
China: yes
Cuba: yes
Djibouti: yes
Egypt: yes
France: abstain
Gabon: yes
Germany: abstain
Ghana: yes
Guatemala: abstain
India: yes
Indonesia: yes
Italy: abstain

Vote complete!

Thank the interpreters for staying 31 minutes later.

Result of vote:

33 votes in favour
1 against
14 abstentions

DRAFT RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

Members explanations after the vote tomorrow.
(2 members on the list).


Dorothee


HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, Thursday 6 March, morning session
Item 7: Human Rights situation in Palestine and other Occupied Arab Territories


States declared their concerns about the grave and serious situation in Palestine, particularly in the Gaza strip. The Arab group condemned the killings of hundreds of innocent people, such as children and women, and flayed the disproportionate response of the Israelian military.

Louise Arbour echoed the concern expressed by the Secretary General on the intensity of violence in southern Israel and Gaza. Civilians must be protected from the attacks and counter-attacks. The International Community must react and persuade both parties to respect human rights and humanitarian laws.
Louise Arbour condemned the Palestinian militants’ rocket attacks as well as the Israel Defence Force’s disproportionate use of force.
Human rights are equal and universal, and no party can claim that, in defending its own population, it was allowed to disavow the rights of others.

• Israel
Explains why it has boycotted the 6th session, the resolution voted was not objective but biased and one-sided, and did not content anything new. The Israelian representative regrets that the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) and the Arab group prefer to put the stress on the number of resolutions voted than their content. This is a waste of time and money.

• Palestine
Critics about the lack of the International resolve to stop and condemn Israel.
Stress out on the systematic violation of economic, social and cultural rights of the Palestinian people. Those rights should be more protected, as well as the rights of the occupied, as Israel is an occupying states.

• Syria
Critics about the indifference and silence of the International Community (there exists a certain kind of selectivity and subjectivity). No condemnation of Israel, no pressure in order that it implements the resolutions voted until now. Israel cannot escape from the International Law. Israel is using the notion of self-defense, however, because of the disproportionate use of force, it is likely more revenge than self-defense.
Problem of the Golan = still occupied by Israel, and no peace until it is occupied.

DEBATE

Pakistan = on behalf of the OIC
Israel = occupying power. Condemned many times by the OIC and Arab group, many resolution have been voted, it is now, more than ever, time to implement fully and effectively those resolutions. OHCHR should have an important role in this process.

Slovenia =on behalf of the European Union
All kinds of terrorism must be condemned. Human rights law and humanitarian law must be respected. There should be no impunity, especially when innocent people are killed. Call for the respect of the economic, social and cultural rights of the Palestinian people from Israel.

Cuba = on behalf of the NAM
effective measures must be taken. The NAM condemned the recent military assault in the Gaza Strip, as well as the unlawful decision to maintain the borders closed to go and from Gaza. The situation in Gaza resembles a collective punition in which the Palestinian population suffers the most.

(not complete but for more details and informations, go to: 
http://www.unog.ch/unog/website/news_media.nsf/(httpNewsByYear_en)/70419A94766313E3C1257404004C0C70?OpenDocument)

MJ.

mercredi 5 mars 2008

HLS 5th March 2008

7th Session of the Human Rights Council
High Level Segment
Geneva, 5th March 2008
Morning

This morning Cameroon, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Botswana, Sweden, Denmark, Lithuania, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Italy, Spain, Equatorial Guinea, and Zimbabwe took the floor.


H.E. Mr. Mark Malloch-Brown, Minister for Africa, Asia and the United Nations of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
After praising UN former Secretary General Kofi Annan’s reform, Mr. Malloch-Brown stated that the Human Rights Council must drive the international community to a better protection of human rights. The international action can and does make a difference, particularly when it is sustained and coordinated. The UK remained concerned about the considerable human rights problems affecting Pakistan. The international community must, therefore, continue its engagement to improve this issue. Similarly, this engagement must continue in Kenya in order to solve the current escalation of violence. Mr. Malloch-Brown, expressing his support to Mrs. Arbour, urged the Sri Lankan government to work constructively with Mrs. Arbour’s Office to achieve an improvement of the human rights situation in Sri Lanka. Concerns about the terrible human rights situation in Zimbabwe were also expressed. Mr. Marloch-Brown also stated that human rights are genuinely universal, and the Council must therefore continue to tackle the discrimination against homosexuals whose basic rights are often violated.
The involvement of a country in the UPR must reflect the commitment to the Council in order to make it effective and strong.

H.E. Mr. Frank Belfrage, State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of Sweden
Aligning with the statement of Slovenia on behalf of the European Union, Mr. Belfrage, referring to UN Secretary General statement, stated that we all need clear commitments and clear accountability to implement those commitments. The Sweden representative saluted the importance of the Universal Declaration, and confirmed his government’s determination to give priority to human rights respect. Mrs. Arbour and her office are the key to respond to the many challenges we have to face to improve the situation of human rights. Sweden expects the Council to move on, since it has different tools and it has demonstrated the values of Special Sessions. Sweden expressed its concerns regarding the serious situation of Myanmar, DPRK, Sri Lanka and Ethiopia.
Despite the moratorium on the death penalty called on by the GA, a large scale of that practice continues in countries like the USA, China and Iran. Concerns have also been expressed about the violation of human rights of homosexuals in Nigeria, Iran and Saudi Arabia. Mr. Belfrage also stated: <Successful elections this past year in countries like Sierra Leone and Timor-Leste […] have underlined the remarkable spread of democracy>.

H.E. Mr. Per Stig Moeller, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Denmark
Denmark underlined the unique role of the UN as promoter of dialogue among states.
Mr. Moeller also stressed the universality of human rights, and defined the Council as the central platform to promote the respect of human rights. The UPR represents a unique tool in the promotion of the Council’s goal.
Mr. Moeller also stated that the exercise of the freedom of speech can never justify death threats or indeed killing another person.

H.E. Mr. Gunter Nooke, Vice-Minister and Commissioner of the Federal Government for human rights and Humanitarian Aid of Germany
Mr. Nooke expressed his Government’s appreciation and esteem for the valuable work undertaken by Mrs. Arbour and her staff. These feelings were also addressed to the work of those NGOs which contributed to enrich the Council’s success. Mr. Nooke declared that the Council is now equipped with the tools and procedures required to enable it to fulfill its role as an efficient and credible centerpiece of the UN’s human rights protection system. Given this fact, the UPR represent the Council’s centerpiece.

H.E. Mr. Gianni Vernetti, Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs of Italy
Italy, supporting the statement of the Slovenian Presidency on behalf of the European Union, is determined to pursue its ongoing efforts to make a substantial contribution to the objectives of the Council. Mrs. Arbour’s work was also greeted on behalf of the Italian Government. Mr. Vernetti urged all participants to take this opportunity to work together in order to solve the most urgent and critical human rights issues and to strengthen the capacity of the council to tackle them. Italy wishes the mandate of the Special Rapporteur for Myanmar to be renewed to enhance the collaboration between the Government of Myanmar and the Special Rapporteur. Italy expressed its concerns regarding the critical situation of Somalia and Darfur. Mr. Vernetti also confirmed its country’s commitment towards the universal abolition of the death penalty. An equitable access to safe water remains a priority for the Italian Government.

H.E. Bernardino Leon, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of Spain
Spain expressed its desire to join the Council and praised the Council commitment as major tool to protect human rights. The biggest challenge for the Council is the fulfillment of a constructive cooperation and dialogue. According to Spain, equality and the elimination of discrimination is a priority. Security policies must respect human rights, and so the war on terrorism cannot justify any kind of violation. Mr. Leon also expressed his country’s commitment towards the universal abolition of the death penalty. Spain wishes to become a member of the council during the 2008-2001 mandate, given the strong commitment for the respect of human rights.

Marco.



7th Session of the Human Rights Council
Geneva, 5th March 2008, 15:00 – 18:00

Panel on Human Rights Voluntary Goals (12:00 – 15:00)

The organisation of this panel is the result of the UN Resolution 6/26 adopted in December 2007 by the Human Right Council in Geneva. The objective is to elaborate Human Rights Voluntary Goals to be launched on the occasion of the celebration of the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.


• Presentation of the panellists

Switzerland: Mr. Andrew Kaplan, Director of International Law and International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, IHEID Geneva.
The set of Voluntary Goals makes participants to HRC, both States and NGOs, nervous. I is feared that fixing goals may induce a prioritisation of Human Rights, undermining some Rights for the profit of others, or that it may undermine the obligation for States to respect the Universal Declaration. States may also be afraid that if they don’t reach the goals they could be punished in terms of cooperation. But the idea is to capture the imagination of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which require discipline and imitate them to set Voluntary Goals to improve the implementation of Human Rights. The main danger would actually be to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration without further commitment for their implementation.

Brazil: MR. Paulo Vannuchi, Minister-Chief of the Special Secretariat of Human Rights of the Presidency of the Republic.
Human Rights violation are still widespread around the world and on the occasion of the 60th anniversary the Voluntary Goals are expected to help to improve the situation. These goals have to be innovative but also consensual in order to avoid tensions. It is an opportunity for dialogue, the fight between two different ideas should be overcome by a third new idea surmounting the earlier opposite positions. The implementation of Human Rights is not an easy task and Brazil still faces problems, particularly in terms of extrajudicial executions.

Italy: MR. Gianni Vernetti, Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs (National Authority for Human Rights issues).
The Voluntary Goals don’t rise the issue of redefining the standards of Human Rights, they are meant to render their implementation more effective. There is a specific action to be carried: the abolition of death penalty, which has been the object of a resolution of the General Assembly in December 2007. The adoption of this resolution is the proof that Human Rights are not the imposition of Western values, since many non-Western countries, especially African voted for it. This example is the evidence that cross-regional approach is possible. In a context of globalisation, the rights of workers are also very important. It is moreover fundamental to maintain a civilisational dialogue, as culture and religion are very sensitive subjects related to Human Rights, and the panel on intercultural dialogue on Human Rights to be hold during this session is a first step in the good direction.

Morocco: MR. Abdelwahed Radi , Minister of Justice.
Intolerance and the respect of cultural diversity are main issues to be addressed by the Voluntary Goals: the fight should be directed against all the extremisms. Morocco supports the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and the Voluntary Goals. The country has ratified almost all the conventions on Human Rights and has already implemented national institutions to deal with the Human Rights, particularly focusing on gender equality, women promotion and children conditions, and is ready to share its experience with others. The voluntary goals shouldn’t add new obligations for the States and the Human Rights should be dealt primarily at the national level.

Sri Lanka: Mr. Mahinda Samarasinghe, Minister of Disaster Management and Human Rights.
The Voluntary Goals are seen as a good mean for improving the capacities to solve Human Rights problems. But they should only be considered on request of the States. The most needed are national structures for an effective implementation. Moreover, it should be kept in mind that situations vary a lot among countries, and they are evolutive. Therefore, each State should take its own decisions to deal with its particular situation.


• Interactive dialogue

Pakistan (speaking on behalf of the OIC): The specificity of Islam should be considered. For this reason, the Islamic Conference has adopted a Declaration on Human Rights in Islam in 1990. Similarly, a charter on Women’s Rights has been adopted in 2007. The assimilation of Islam and terrorism has to be stopped.

Slovenia (speaking on behalf of the EU): A lot is still to be done for the implementation of the Human Rights, especially in terms of gender equality and homosexual and transsexual rights. Other concerns are the implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the follow up of Durban Conference.

Mexico: Mexico agrees with the principles of the Voluntary Goals and is particularly concerned by the ratification of the Convention on the Protection of Migrant Workers.

France: Most important is to make sure that all of the Declarations in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) are upheld before moving on to new subjects or creating new declarations. Must focus on improving the already-existing problems before trying to solve new ones. The universality of the Declaration should be strongly reaffirmed, and its unity is also fundamental. The fragmentation of the Declaration should be avoided.

Cuba: UDHR is not as universal as one might wish or one might think. There must be a set of goals to serve as a guide so that each specific country can work with them. These sets of goals must adapt to the specific needs of the country itself, so as to address the individual needs of each country more thoroughly.

Nicaragua: Hunger and Poverty are the largest and most frequent human rights violations.
It is also important that all citizens are involved in policymaking, (mentioning specifically men and women), so as to address the needs of everyone.

Saudi Arabia: There must be a focus on strengthening international and regional cooperation in dialogue of the Millennium Development Goals.

Ireland: One of the most important human rights issues that must be addressed is the acceptance of different sexual orientations. There must start to be more of a celebration of difference. Domestic law is another issue that must be addressed, along with the full abolition of the Death Penalty.

Colombia: There must be a national punishment for all human right violations (please verify with your notes—I’m not sure that is correct)

Algeria: There are two priorities concerning Human Rights:
1) Must put and end to foreign occupation, for it concerns one of the worst violations of human rights, (mentioning specifically, settlements). It leads to racism, xenophobia, and in particular, attacks by groups with a shared religion.
2) Religion defamation has reached its height in atrocity, most specifically anti-Semitic policy against Arabs. Racial discrimination must also continue to be seriously addressed.

Uruguay: The drawing up of national plans to enforce the elimination of all forms of discrimination is imperative.

Canada: Ratification of the core international instruments along with the establishment of Human Rights educational programs are important

Singapore: No consensus exists on the death penalty, for there are many countries that consider it simply a form of criminal justice, therefore it shouldn’t be considered as a Human Right.

China: When emphasizing the universality of the UDHR, it is important to remember that each country has its own policies, and it is equally as important to consider these different policies when creating declarations. It is imperative to leave enough space in these declarations so that each country and its individual policies can easily be addressed. It is also important that the international level provides better protection for each and every country.

Portugal: Agrees with the Slovenia (who spoke on behalf of the EU) on the subject of creating deadlines. There is a worry about creating new deadlines for the fear that they could undermine the already-existing deadlines. Agrees also with France about the importance of focusing on the already-existing Voluntary Goals instead of focusing all of the attention on creating new ones. It is important not to undermine the already-established Voluntary Goals.

Palestine (Speaking on behalf of the League of Arab States): It is important to take into consideration the Millennium Development Goals. The main concern of the Arab countries is making declarations compatible with international freedom in the exercise of these rights.

NGO—CIBICUS (?): Civil society and governments must work together to implement the UDHR, and they are ready as a civil organization to work with all governments around the world to better achieve this goal.

General Segment (15:00-1800)

This meeting was a general debate on different topics such as:
the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories,
the work of the Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR), the Universal Periodic Review (UPR),
the rising problem of Islamophobia, the place of freedom of expression or opinion in relation with defamation of religions,
the climate change which will, if not already has, many consequences on human rights (rights of refugee and migrants).


Palestine: There are still many huge violations of human rights taking place around the world. Specifically mentioned were the abduction of children in Darfur. The situation in Palestine is the Arab Nations’ main concern, and also the cause of a lot of animosity between these Arab Nations and many Western Countries who continue to support Israel. Voices condolences and support for the Iraqi situation.
Critics about the imbalanced geographical representation within the OHCHR

Pakistan (Speaking on behalf of the Islamic Conference): Islamophobia is becoming bigger and anyone ever thought it could, and it is a priority to find ways to stop this individual intolerance. States (on a national capacity) the desire to be elected to the Council for the year 2011-2012.

Uruguay: Wants the adoption, by consensus, of the declarations concerning the Rights of the Child.

China: The situations of xenophobia and the plight of immigrants are worsening. It is imperative that we learn to respect one another in order to reach a common ground. It is also important to adopt a more inclusive way to implement human rights declarations by understanding differences.

Mexico: Two main priorities include the fight against terrorism and defending the Rights of Disabled Persons

Bangladesh: Five imperative priorities.
1) Poverty is the cause and the consequence of many human right violations today. The priority to how the international community can better fight poverty.
2) Climate change. Bangladesh will be submerged underwater if the sea level raises only 1 meter
3) Migration. Migrant workers are discriminated, and we must protect their rights
4) The defamation of religion
5) Support of Palestine

Malaysia: The priority is the Right to Development.
Critics about the impunity enjoyed by Israel, no implementation of the decisions of the three special sessions on the Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Malaysia played a crucial role in establishing an ASEAN HR mechanism = important in order to build an ASEAN community

Russian Federation: Constructive cooperation between the states, intergovernmental bodies, and civil society is imperative. There is also great concern for the growth of xenophobia and racial violence around the world. Also, in referring to a discussion yesterday, it is important that the famine of 1938 is not considered genocide.

Canada: Two main priorities.
1) The Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Full exercise to free speech gives rights to all other rights. Violations often occur with impunity, and requests supports of all delegations to renew this mandate.
2) Violence Against Women. Violations of this mandate also continue to occur frequently, and requests support of all delegations to renew this mandate as well as the consideration of taking further steps to put a stop to these violations.

Jordan: Voices importance of putting a stop to domestic violence, the best interests of the child. Torture. 

UNHCR:
UNHCR and HRC = complementary work. The universal applicability of HRs (particularly asylum-seekers, refugees, stateless persons and internally displaced persons) must be respected.
Right to asylum is difficult because of anti-migration laws.

AUSTRALIA:
It commended the OHCHR for its work to the promotion and protection of HRs around the world, including in the Asia-Pacific region.
Positive attitude and constructive work with the HRC.

USA:
The basic mission of HRC is to protect people, not governments.
The USA welcomed the special session on Sudan and Myanmar, but is still waiting for substantive action by those countries, and stringent actions in DPRK.
About Freedom of expression, the USA is surprised by the increased demands for a limitation to this right. Freedom of expression is crucial, and some countries use limitations on the freedom of expression in order to censor the press. Freedom of expression and Freedom of religion inseparable, instead of limiting these rights, the HRC should do all its best to defend and protect them.
The USA asked for the renewal of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion, and on HR defenders.


Jean, Virginia, MJ

mardi 4 mars 2008

HLS, 4 March

7th Session of the Human Rights Council
High Level Segment
Geneva, 4th March 2008



Morning

This morning Ghana, Mauritania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Yemen, Tanzania, the Maldives, Ecuador, Nigeria, Indonesia, Zambia, Iraq, Kenya, Poland, Iran and the Council of Europe took the floor.

Ambros Dery, Minister of State at the Ministry of Justice of Ghana
Mr Dery said that, besides the universality and indivisibility of human rights, it was also important to envisage a new international order where economic, social and cultural rights were ultimately placed on par with civil and political rights.

Limam Ould Teguedi, Minister of Justice of Mauritania
The democratic process that the country had undergone recently had had a big effect on the development of the relations of Mauritania with international organizations in the field of human rights. In this perspective, the governement took important initiatives to foster the return of refugees.

Abdulla Shahid, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Maldives
During his speech, Mr Shahid stressed the impact of the climate change and human rights and presented the resolution that will be discussed during the session. He explained that the resolution would simply ask the Human Rights Council to consider, in a considered, non-politicized and non-condemnatory manner, the implications of climate change for the full enjoyment of human rights.

Ojo Maduekwe, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Nigeria
Mr Maduekwe said that Nigeria wellcomed the recent statement made by the Deputy high Commissioner fro Human Rights highlighting that climate change now constitutes a direct threat to the enjoyment of human rights. He added that no time had to be lost in addressing this issue, particularly in supporting the process in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to reach a global agreement on the post 2010 Kyoto commitments.

Hassan Wirajuda, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Indonesia
Mr Wirajuda stressed the importance of the political will of the member States of the Council to meet the expectations of the 7th session of the HRC. He said that Regional and sub-regional arrangements could complete and reinforce national and international human rights promotion. Mr. Wirajuda noted that the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) should establish an ASEAN human rights body. Moreover, the intimate link between human rights issues and climate change was also noted. Mr Wirajuda said that the Council should now take a carefully measured approach on this issue.

Hussein Jasim Nasser Al-Zuhairi, Vice-Minister for Human Rights of Iraq
Mr Al-Zuhairi said that Iraq had made several security improvements since last March, with the exception of certain hot spots like Baghdad. The implementation of the rule of law plan since February 2007 was one of the reasons for this security improvement. The Iraqi Government, with the help of international organizations, had tried to address the worsening situation of refugees and internally displaced persons.

Dorothy Angote, Vice-Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs of Kenya
This session came at a time when Kenya was emerging from a major political challenge, arising from the post-election violence that erupted following the announcement of the Presidential results. Over 1,000 Kenyans lost their lives, about 350,000 Kenyans were internally displaced and property worth billions of shillings was destroyed. Kenya had subsequently put in place effective mechanisms aimed at bringing these acts of violence to an end and had also provided coordinated humanitarian assistance to the displaced people. The agreement of 28 February 2008, signed between President Mwai Kibaki and Radila Odinga, was a triumph for dialogue and diplomacy and also for peace and reconciliation.

Witold Waszczykowski, Under–Secretary of State at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Poland
Concerning the establishment of a system of Special Procedures, both thematic and country specific, Poland believed that this system should be reinforced; the Universal Periodic Review should not be viewed as an alternative to country mandates, these two mechanisms should be considered as complementary. He hoped that the review of all remaining country mandates would take place according to the rules set out in adequate documents and in the spirit of mutual understanding and cooperation.

Manouchehr Mottaki, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Iran
Mrt Mottaki strongly criticized Israel for the situation in Gaza. The world was also experiencing new forms of xenophobia, which endangered peace and coexistence. Iran would actively participate in the Durban Review Conference. The growing tendency toward Ismalmophobia was also a critical issue. Freedom of speech was important, but the protection of the religion was also important. The European Union should adopt measures rules and regulations to forbid the offence of one’s religion.

Pierre-Etienne



Afternoon

This afternoon dignitaries from Burkina Faso, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tunisia, Belgium, Turkey, Guatemala, Belarus, Viet Nam, Ukraine and Nicaragua took the floor.

Marat Tazhin, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan strongly supported the creation of the HCR and hopes that it will be strengthened. In recent years, the world has gone through fundamental changes that have negative effects on international security and stability, Mr. Tahzin said. He referred to the “global threat of terrorism, discrimination, xenophobia, natural disasters, internal conflicts, the HIV/AIDS pandemic, problems of refugees and displaced persons, trafficking in women and children who affected the protection of human rights and freedoms”.

Akmal Saidov, Director of the National Centre for Human Rights of Uzbekistan
Uzbekistan took significant steps in the field of human rights: the abolishment of death penalty since January 1st, the introduction of the democratic institute of justice known as habeas corpus, the entry into force of the law on guarantees of the rights of child and an increase of the role of political parties in democratization of society through the constitutional law. State policy of Uzbekistan in the field of human rights is being carried out in a lot of areas, among others: the system of legislation on human rights has been established; the institutional system of protection of human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests has been created; a national monitoring of observance and protection of human rights and freedoms is being carried out; a continuous system of education in the field of human rights is functioning.

Bechir Tekkari, Minister of Justice and Human Rights of Tunisia
The Minister said that Tunisia is worried about the escalation of violence in Palestine. He stated that extreme poverty is affecting the today’s world. Tunisia is also combating a lot of issues in its territory like exclusion, marginalisation, xenophobia and terrorism.

Pierre Chevalier, Special Envoy of the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Belgium
HRC has to focus on its obligation to protect and promote liberties of individuals and human rights. All people have the right to be protected without any distinction. States should respect the absolute prohibition of torture, inhuman punishment and ill-treatment. Nobody should be arbitrarily detained or should be the victim of forced disappearances. The fight against terrorism should not excuse the violation of human rights and of the international law. It is unacceptable that women, children and people with different sexual orientation are harassed, tortures or killed, Mr. Chevalier said.

Rafet Akgunay, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Turkey
Respect of human rights is universal, indivisible, interrelated, interdependent, said Mr. Akgunay. The Minister stated that we cannot think of Human Rights without democracy and vice versa.

Miguel Angel Ibarra Gonzalez, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs of Guatemala
The Government of Guatemala has enjoyed the establishment of the HRC and is pleased of the work of Mrs. Arbour. As member of the HRC, Guatemala is honoured to be submitted to the UPR, in order to improve the situation of Human Rights in the country. Guatemala wants to improve the issue of racial discrimination, and hopes to involve indigenous people in the political life of the country.

Viktor Gaisenok, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Belarus
Belarus is taking part of the high level segment for the first time in the last five years. The Minister supported the HRC in order to protect human rights and freedoms around the world. He greeted the abolishment of the politicized Special Rapporteurs on Cuba and Belarus. Mr. Gaisenok said that an important issue is the trafficking of people and he condemned it. He urged that the UN should solve this problem at a global level.

Pham Binh Minh, Standing Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Viet Nam
Mr. Pham stressed important issues like extreme poverty (“over one billion people were still living in extreme poverty”), education for all children over the world and women’s discrimination.
He also recommended a non politicization of the HRC. He affirmed that Vietnam is doing its best to improve its human rights situation and living standards. Moreover, Vietnam has been recognized by the UN as one of the first countries to achieve the poverty reduction for the Millennium Development Goals.

Valdrack Jaentschke, Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua
As a Member-State of the HRC, Nicaragua hopes that the Universal Periodic Review will be an impartial tool to the protection of HR. The Minister focused his attention on two issues: the asymmetric distribution of health access in the world and the free access to education. He stated also that women and poor peasants were supported by the government by providing them micro-businesses.

Rights to reply
Speaking in right of reply were Uzbekistan, Greece, Albania, Iran, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Algeria, Macedonia, Japan and the Netherlands.

Marco and Meriam

HLS, 3 March: Statements

7th Session of the Human Rights Council
High Level Segment
Geneva, 3rd March 2008



Opening of the Session


Mr Doru Romulus Costea, President of the Human Rights Council.
Mr Costea opened the Session announcing the agenda and the challenges of this session. As a matter of fact, the President stressed that, now that the mechanisms are in place, the Human Rights Council (HRC) has to prove its efficiency.
In this perspective, the increase of the budget of the United Nations Office at Geneva (UNOG) that will benefit the Council is an important step to face the challenges of the new institution.

Mr Ban-Ki- Moon, Secretary General of the United Nations.
Mr Ban-Ki-Moon said 2008 will be a crucial year for the promotion and protection of Human Rights and the HRC has a very important role to play. On the one hand, the HRC has to meet the expectations of the international community, assuring the recognition and the promotion of Human Rights without selectivity and political considerations. The HRC has also, through the special procedures, to be a credible institution, permitting early detection of violations of Human Rights.
Mr Ban-Ki-Moon ended his speech by highlighting that the power of the HRC belongs from its credibility, not its force.

Ms Louise Arbour, High Commissioner for the Human Rights.
Ms Arbour said the HRC is now ready and the attention of the session has to be focused on the respect of Human rights rather than on its procedures. The Council is operational and has to respond to its vocation.

Ms. Micheline Calmy-Rey, host country.
During her speech, Ms Calmy-Rey recalled the importance of the protection of the rights of women. She expressed the disappointment of Switzerland concerning the behaviour of Myanmar for the application of the resolution that was voted by the HRC. Moreover, Ms Calmy-Rey expressed her preoccupation for the respect of Human Rights in Sri Lanka and in the Palestinian territories.
Concerning the relationship between the 3rd commission of the General Assembly and the HRC, Ms Calmy-Rey, said that a balance had to be found. The General Assembly has to define the legal framework and the HRC has to be the operational framework, monitoring the application of the human rights treaty bodies.

Mr Francisco Santos Calderon, Vice President Colombia
Considering the situation of Colombia, the speech of Mr Santos Calderon was focused on the terrorism and the action of the Colombian government to face the terrorist attacks of the FARC.
The Colombian Vice President stressed the opportunity represented by the Universal Periodic Review (UPR).

Mr Dimitrij Rupel, MFA Slovenia
Speaking on behalf of the European Union, Mr Rupel stressed that Slovenia subscribed the interconnection of Human Rights in this year of the anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the anniversary of the Vienna Declaration. The UE will work to enlarge and strength the mandate of the rapporteurs in Myanmar, DPRK, Somalia and RDC. An inquiry mission should be sent to Kenya.

Mr Felipe Perez Roque, MFA Cuba
Mr Perez Roque said that the 7th session of the HRC will be a test to see if this institution is really different from the former Commission of Human Rights. In this perspective, the UPR is an important instrument to show the impartiality, non-selectivity and independence of the Council. During his speech, the Cuban Foreign Minister stressed that his country is playing a constructive role for the implementation of the Council.

Afternoon:

H. E. Mr. Jorge Sampaio, (Brazil) United Nations High Representative of Alliance of Civilizations
Mr. Sampaio underlined the need to reject extremism in order to live in a world based on peace. It is the duty of member states of the Alliance of Civilizations to strengthen their commitment to achieve a common goal, and convince those countries not yet members of the Alliance to join it. The Alliance urges to bolstering the mutual respect, in the prospective to build bridges among societies in the respect of Human Rights. As members of the UN, each State must play an important role in the Alliance to allow member states to find their way to challenge all issues of the globalized world. The Alliance counts on State’s commitment to achieve its goals through dialogue. In this overview the HRC has a leadership role, also to prevent polarizations and conflicts. The Alliance and the HRC should consult also at a political level, in order to achieve a common role.

H.E. Mr. Maxime Verhagen, Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands
Stressing the importance of respect, as key principle of the main religions of the world, Mr. Verhagen urged the need to the commitment of mutual respect. The promotion of Human Rights has a central position in the Dutch foreign policy. Human Rights are not a creation of the West; no religion or culture can justify their violation. The Dutch Representative expressed his government appreciation to Mrs. Arbour’s work, carried on in its full independence.
According to Mr. Verhagen, human rights must be applied to all people, in all places and at all times. The protection if children, women, homosexuals must be guaranteed. The fight against terrorism cannot justify the use of torture. The right to water must also be included in the list of human rights. The UPR is extremely important for the Netherlands, as a universal tool.

H.E. Mr. Anand Sharma, Minister of State for External Affairs of India
India confirmed its support to the HRC, and it is confident concerning the achievement of the expectations of the Council. It is therefore imperative for India to successfully continue its commitment to contribute to this initial success. Mr. Sharma stressed the importance of the UPR, and express India’s commitment to be among those countries to be evaluated.
The HRC must also play a key role in the war on terrorism, which is a direct violation of Human Rights, especially the right to life.

H.E. Mr. Jonas Gahr Store, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Norway
Mr. Gahr Store underlined the independence of the HRC, which holds the office of the protection of Human Rights. The key issues in the Norwegian foreign policy are the abolishment of death penalty (which is against the principle of humanity), and torture. Norway is committed for the promotion of the freedom of speech, and the respect of media, often themselves victims of the war of terrorism as direct witnesses. Norway expressed its support to the OHCHR and to Mrs. Arbour’s work.

H.E. Mr. Vuk Jeremic, Minister for Foreign Affairs of Serbia
Mr. Jeremic stressed how the promotion of Human Rights is essential to the achievement of human development. Willing to be elected as member of the HRC, Serbia expressed its commitment to bolster the Council’s actions and power. Serbia is proud of its record as a central pillar of human rights protection in Southeast Europe. This does not mean that there are no more challenges, but it indicates Serbia’s conviction to face every obstacle head on to solve problems and to achieve concrete results. Mr. Jeremic went on pointing out his government’s concerns regarding the human rights violation in Kosovo, currently under the UN administration. The unilateral independence declaration of Kosovo represents a terrible precedent.

H.E. Mr. Mahinda Samarasinghe, Minister of Disarmament Management and Human Rights of Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka stressed its full cooperation and engagement at all levels in bringing the work of the 7th Session to a successful conclusion. Sri Lanka is now facing a number of critical challenges. Among those, there is the need to secure and guarantee the rights of all Sri Lankan, threatened by terrorism. The Government of Sri Lanka is therefore standing in its unwavering determination to continue to oppose the use of terrorism as a mean of achieving political gains. While firm in preserving the fundamental freedoms of all, Sri Lanka upholds the respect of its sovereignty and territorial integrity. Facing several ethnic issues, the Government has taken action to ensure language rights in accordance with Constitutional obligations. Sri Lanka is open to a constructive engagement with the international human rights mechanism and it open itself up to the UPR process in May.

H.E. Mr. Yasuhide Nakayama, Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs of Japan

Japan shared the opinion of the international community of the international community that the Council should be an effective institution. Japan hopes that the UPR will be proved to be an effective tool for the HRC. Japan stressed the importance of full cooperation by every country with the activities of special rapporteurs, including continuous dialogue with the international community. Dialogue plays a key role to resolve issues and promote the respect of human rights. Japan organized a seminar on support for democratization for Japanese NGOs, with the collaboration of the UNDEF. Last September, Japan signed the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Mr. Nakayama also remembered his government involvement for the protection of children victims of sexual exploitation. Japan, in order to continue its contribution, intends to stand as a candidate at the next election for the HRC.

H.E. Mr. Manuel Lobo Antunes, Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Portugal
Portugal associated itself with the statement made by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Slovenia on behalf of the EU. Mr. Antunes underlined how the promotion and protection of human rights are among the core duties of the international community, and he expressed his hope concerning the strengthening of the mechanism of the HRC. All the international community has to work together to reach the common goals. Mr. Antunes pleased the work of Mrs. Arbour in preventing the human rights violations, and pay tribute to all those who stand for the respect of human rights. Portugal urged that the international community should bear the heavy responsibility to make the HRC a new credible tool.
The Deputy Foreign Minister of Portugal also said: “ My country attaches crucial importance to the suffering of the victims of human rights violations. We have striven to raise the cases of those who live in fear anywhere in the world, as we did in the past with the East Timorese.”

Pierre-Etienne, Marco and Human Rights -Team

HLS, 3.03.08 by Country

Report by subject

On the opening of the High Level Segment, the following States have condemned the situation in Myanmar:
-Switzerland
-Slovenia
-Luxemburg
-Portugal


The following States have condemned the situation in Sri Lanka:
-Switzerland
-Luxemburg


The following States have condemned the situation in North Korea:
-Slovenia
-Portugal


Other difficult human right situations which have been mentioned by several countries are Palestine and Darfur.

Dorothee